Previous: « Title Lawyer Sentenced to 46 M... | Next: Maryland Announces Results of ... »

JUDGE ALSUP SHUTS DOREAN DOWN

Thursday, July 07 2005 19:15
TRO Issued Pending Order to Show Cause on Permanent Injunction

On July 5, 2005, the United States of America filed a civil action against Dale Scott Heineman and Kurt F. Johnson d/b/a The Dorean Group, The Oxford Trust and Universal Trust seeking an injunction against the continued operation of the Dorean Group mortgage elimination scheme. According to FBI statements in court papers, $2.8 million was deposted into one Dorean bank account over the course of a year and at least $230,000 was wired from that account to a bank account in Riga, Latvia.

On July 6, 2005, Judge William Alsup accepted the case, finding that it was related to the cases filed in the Northern District of California by Heineman and Johnson late last year which resulted in his prior order dismissing those cases and ordering sanctions.

On July 6, 2005, Judge William Alsup signed a Temporary Restraining Order prohibiting the defendants from further violating 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Mail Fraud), 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud), and 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (Bank Fraud) through their “mortgage elimination” program, and from alienating or disposing of property obtained as a result of said violations.

In particular, the TRO prohibits the defendants, their officers, agents, brokers, attorneys and employees from:

(A) Engaging in any activities related to their mortgage elimination scheme, including:

(1) Advertising their debt elimination services via the Internet, telephone, or any other wire communication, or by mail (whether by commercial carrier or United States Postal Service carrier), to any individual and/or any entity;

(2) Soliciting or receiving fees from any individual or entity;

(3) Creating any trusts, or entering any trust agreements;

(4) Delivering, sending, mailing, or wiring “presentment packets” to lenders, or any documents that purport to appoint themselves as the lender’s agent or attorney-in-fact, or that demand that the lender acquiesce in the scheme;

(5) Filing or recording any documents with any county clerk, or county recorder’s office, or registers of deeds;

(6) Receiving proceeds from refinanced loans and/or sale of properties to which defendants have applied their mortgage elimination program;

(7) Offering, providing, and/or sharing of advice, including but not limited to seminars, tutorials, and conferences, relating in any way to the Dorean Group’s practices.

(B) Withdrawing, transferring, removing, dissipating, and disposing of property obtained as a result of its fraudulent conduct, and freezing defendants’ assets that they obtained as a result of the fraud, including funds in the following back accounts:

Account No. 03916839

Account Name: Lasting Legacy Trust

Fremont Bank

32000 Alvarado Boulevard

Union City, California 94587

Account No. 03916847

Account Name: Cancer-Free Trust

Fremont Bank

32000 Alvarado Boulevard

Union City, California 94587

While the prior order obtained by the North Carolina Attorney General only prohibited conduct within North Carolina, the Temporary Restraining Order issued by Judge Alsup prohibits the conduct nationwide.

An Order to Show Cause hearing has been scheduled for August 1, 2005 at 1:00 p.m. At that hearing, the defendants will have an opportunity to present evidence as to why a preliminary injunction should not issue pending trial of the government's case.

3 comments

  • Comment Link antwon jones Wednesday, May 17 2006 08:40 posted by antwon jones

    :shut: i have had a problem with the deeds of my proporties, i have the feeling that my proporties have been subsuquent to fraud, i need some one to help me in this matter. i live in the new mexico area, plz send me an e-mail as soon as possible . thank you

  • Comment Link luis Wednesday, August 03 2005 13:10 posted by luis

    Apparently you (Randy Simmons) believe in all this crap. If the Dorean group is doing legal stuff why is everything done in secrect. What the dorean group is claming, is that the U.S. ecomony is flawed. even if it is, the government will not allow these two idiots to ruin the U.S. economy.

    I wanted to believe in this DOREAN system. but the more i read about the more absurd it looks. Why would the banks eliminate the mortgage when they loaned us the money, and know that they will make over 300% profit for each loan.

    If the Dorean group belived that the federal reserve was not right in using Federal Reserve notes (dollars bills) because it not real money, then why are they charging people money (dollar bills) to eliminate their mortgage. Apparently they believed that the money is good or they would not ask for money.


    see ya laterz

  • Comment Link randy simmons Friday, July 29 2005 20:13 posted by randy simmons

    I was just wondering how your website keeps continuing to delete any posts that is controversial against your frivolous posts which adamantly oppose the legal and lawful substance of proof which is enudated in every mortgage contract that is being forced upon the unsuspecting general public everyday.

    Since your website is created and operated by lawyers, then surely when you review a standard mortgage contract, you would have to see the fraudulent contents that the banks have so brilliantly woven into the gibberish formats??

    Another question which concerns me very much is; how could this judge Alsup make the above ruling with clearly denies the Dorena people their ongoing constitution rights?? I thought the way our judicial system worked in the US, the US Supreme court has to be the ones to rule on constitution laws and lawful substance of such???

    One other issue which has never been addressed in any of the Dorean gibberish that the Feds, the attorney sites which the banks are paying them to operate in an effort to scare and intimidate people asking lawful questions, the other puppet sites such as local area franchise owners of the Better Business bureaus in a couple of states is; what happened to these bonds that the Dorean Group issued to all of these banks [especially the banks which signed a release of obligation of mortgages] and where are they now???

    These bonds were legal bonds and most over the past 2 or 3 years were readilly accepted by the so-called banks which said they were legal holders of these notes and to my knowledge none of these bonds were ever returned to doerean.

    Once Dorean has enough public support to force these puppet judges to issue discovery orders to find these bonds, I am sure they will find that these banks that accepted the bonds have endorsed them and have since been illegally claiming them as assets, much like they do every promissory note that the unsuspecting general public does everyday.

    Do not worry about deleting this post from your website, because as soon as we post this message we will make a copy and replace everyday if necessary.

    It would be good [since your site is promoted by attorneys] that you would at least try to play the game in an amenable way.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

  • del.icio.us: frauddiva
  • Facebook Page: 202080166468810#!
  • FeedBurner: MortgageFraudBlog
  • Linked In Group: 2104121
  • Google Reader: 562472456
  • Technorati: rdollar
  • Twitter: FraudDiva
  • YouTube: FraudDiva
Quick Links
Get our newsletter
Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
Resources
 

Rachel Dollar Rachel Dollar, the editor of Mortgage Fraud Blog is an attorney and Certified Mortgage Banker who handles litigation for lending institutions and secondary market investors.
Read more about Ms. Dollar

Most Read Articles
Most Commented Articles