Previous: « $1.7M Provided to Arizona to F... | Next: Maryland Announces Results of ... »

Florida Man Indicted For Inflating Property Values

Thursday, June 26 2008 06:43

Juan Carlos Gonzalez, 50, Jacksonville, Florida, was indicted on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud. The maximum penalties Gonzalez faces if convicted are 30 years of imprisonment and a fine of $1,000,000. Gonzalez was arrested and made his initial appearance in federal court. He was released on $10,000 bond and required to stay at home with electronic monitoring.

According to the indictment, during 2004 and 2005, Gonzalez negotiated the purchase of houses and entered into contracts with the sellers of the properties. For each property, Gonzalez retained an appraiser who appraised the property at a significantly inflated value requested by Gonzalez. At Gonzalez's direction, the inflated appraisal price was submitted to a lender in support of an application for a mortgage loan based upon the higher price. The lender was not informed that the price listed in the transaction documents was higher than the actual price negotiated with the seller.

The Indictment alleges further that at Gonzalez's direction, fraudulent financial documents and information, including such things as altered bank statements and payroll records, were submitted in support of the loan application. The false financial information was intended to cause the lender to approve a loan in a higher amount than would have been approved if true financial information had been submitted. At the closing on the property, Gonzalez received the difference between the loan amount, which was based on the inflated appraisal, and the actual purchase price, usually described with terms such as "assignment fee" or "payoff of second mortgage" that did not exist. This difference was the proceeds of the fraud.

The indictment provides details of one transaction in which Gonzalez entered into an agreement to purchase a house for $490,000. He obtained an inflated appraisal of the house for $625,000 and submitted first and second mortgage loan applications reflecting a sales price of $625,000. Gonzalez also submitted altered bank account statements showing significantly larger cash balances in the account than were actually there. Based upon this information, the lender approved the loans. At the closing on the property, a check for $134,000 was issued to an entity controlled by Gonzalez. This amount was listed on closing documents as an "Assignment of Contract Fee."

The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Arnold B. Corsmeier.

An indictment is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed a violation of the federal criminal laws, and every defendant is presumed innocent until, and unless, proven guilty.

5 comments

  • Comment Link Guy Andrews, Certified Residential Wednesday, July 02 2008 17:42 posted by Guy Andrews, Certified Residential

    The title of the article is misleading. Since it is the appraiser's opinion of value that is used to secure the financing, then the appraiser should be held accountable for their opinion of value. Gonzalez was trying to get away with some kind of scam, but without an appraiser advocating for Gonzalez it never could have worked. Gonzalez did not inflate the value, but he may have inflated the price.

  • Comment Link Gary Crabtree, SRA Wednesday, July 02 2008 12:20 posted by Gary Crabtree, SRA

    The problem is that it was the appraiser who inflated the value, therefore he is still a conspirator and should, at least, get a plea bargain but not just walk.

  • Comment Link JJ Wednesday, July 02 2008 10:03 posted by JJ

    In some of these cases, the appraiser is helping the prosecution by testifying against the other players. That's why they don't always get indicted themselves.

  • Comment Link Gary Crabtree, SRA Wednesday, July 02 2008 08:32 posted by Gary Crabtree, SRA

    Why didn't they indicte the appraiser also? Without his fraudulent appraisals the defendant would not have been able to pull this fraud off. The appraiser should have been indicted for conspiracy to commit. 18 USC 1000 - 1344

  • Comment Link One Ford Road Monday, June 30 2008 09:30 posted by One Ford Road

    Why did this man ever think he was going to continue to get away with this?

    Amanda <3

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

  • del.icio.us: frauddiva
  • Facebook Page: 202080166468810#!
  • FeedBurner: MortgageFraudBlog
  • Linked In Group: 2104121
  • Google Reader: 562472456
  • Technorati: rdollar
  • Twitter: FraudDiva
  • YouTube: FraudDiva
Quick Links
Get our newsletter
Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
Resources
 

Rachel Dollar Rachel Dollar, the editor of Mortgage Fraud Blog is an attorney and Certified Mortgage Banker who handles litigation for lending institutions and secondary market investors.
Read more about Ms. Dollar

Most Read Articles
Most Commented Articles