Previous: « $1.7M Provided to Arizona to F... | Next: Maryland Announces Results of ... »

2 Former Credit Suisse Brokers Indicted For Fraud And Conspiracy

Friday, September 05 2008 05:21

A superseding indictment was unsealed charging Julian Tzolov, 35, and Eric Butler, 36, former brokers at Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, with conspiracy, securities fraud, and wire fraud. The superseding indictment alleges that the defendants schemed to obtain higher sales commissions by selling auction rate securities (“ARS”) backed by mortgages to Credit Suisse clients who, in fact, had placed orders to buy ARS backed by student loans. The defendants concealed their scheme by falsifying the names of the ARS the clients bought and otherwise misleading the clients into believing they had bought ARS backed by student loans. When the mortgage-backed ARS market failed, the clients lost their money.

According to the superseding indictment, Tzolov and Butler were, until September 2007, brokers who ran Credit Suisse’s Corporate Cash Management Group, a division that helped its clients manage excess corporate cash holdings. Beginning in November 2004, the defendants approached various companies (“the companies”) that had banking relationships with Credit Suisse to pitch the benefits of investing cash in ARS backed by student loans, typically Federal Family Education Loan Program loans guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Education. These ARS were sold, and the interest paid on the securities was set, at auctions that occurred every 28 days. In their sales presentations, the defendants represented that the student loanbacked ARS were very low-risk investments guaranteed by the United States government; that the market for the securities was very liquid; and that the risk of an auction failing was minimal because of the federal government guarantee. As a result, a number of the companies agreed to invest money in ARS backed by student loans.

Subsequently, without the knowledge or consent of the companies, the defendants began to use the companies’ funds to purchase higher-yield, mortgage-backed collateralized debt obligations, or “CDOs.” CDOs are asset-backed products built from a portfolio of fixed-income assets, including mortgages, subprime mortgages, and second mortgages. Mortgage-backed CDOs traded as auction rate securities (“CDO-ARS”) are purchased through an auction process on the same 28-day cycle as the ARS backed by student loans. However, because of their greater risk, CDO-ARS provided a higher yield and, as a result, the commissions paid to the defendants by Credit Suisse were far greater for sales of CDO-ARS.

In order to conceal their scheme, the defendants sent the companies e-mails in which they, or their assistants, falsified the names of the products bought, sold, and held by the companies, falsely creating the appearance that the companies had invested in student loanbacked ARS. In some instances, the fraudulent e-mails listed the CDO-ARS products with the term “CDO” removed from the name. In other instances, the e-mails included the term “student loan” or “SL” in the name of a CDO-ARS product, despite the fact that the CDO-ARS had no connection whatsoever to student loans.

In approximately August 2007, the defendants’ scheme was discovered when the market for the mortgage-backed CDOs purchased by the companies collapsed and various auctions for CDO-ARS began to fail, resulting in the defendants being unable to liquidate the companies’ investments and return their money.

“The defendants’ fraudulent misrepresentations and ‘bait-and-switch’ tactics saddled investors with unknown risks they did not bargain for,” stated United States Attorney Campbell.

“Those who engage in such schemes will be aggressively investigated, prosecuted, and held to account for their criminal activity.”

Mr. Campbell thanked the Securities and Exchange Commission for its assistance and added that the government’s investigation is continuing.

FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Mershon stated, “Investors who were told they were purchasing relatively low-risk securities backed by student loans were unwittingly purchasing high-risk mortgage-backed securities. For a nearly three-year period, what Tzolov and Butler sold their clients was a bill of goods. The FBI remains committed to policing the securities industry to protect investors from all forms of unscrupulous and illegal conduct.”

The securities fraud count and the two counts of wire fraud each carry a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment and a $5 million fine. The conspiracy count carries a maximum sentence of five years’ imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it has filed civil charges against both Tzolov and Butler.

The criminal case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Greg D. Andres, Christina Dugger, John P. Nowak, and Claire Kedeshian.

1 Comment

  • Comment Link Sindy Friday, January 16 2009 02:35 posted by Sindy

    credit, credit cards So you have borrowed up to your limit on your federally funded student loan offers. You applied for every scholarship imaginable, and accepted all the grants you received. Yet you still cannot afford all of the expensed related to your higher education. Now what? With all the talk of predatory lenders in the media, you may be scared away from getting a private student loan to cover the rest of the costs. There are many positive benefits to using private loans. Do not let media hype keep you from going to college – or convince you to avoid securing student credit card for your expenses. The benefits to private student loans are individual to the student's situation. Yet each student has some potential for a positive experience of using private loans and student credit cards. All it takes is a little information to make an educated choice. Spotlight Student Card: . The first way to keep a private student loan a positive for yourself is to be sure you ask the loan company what their lowest offered fee and interest rate combination. Then be sure to note whether that combination applies to the life of the loan or just an introductory period. Do not be fooled by an incredibly low interest rate, or waived fee.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

  • del.icio.us: frauddiva
  • Facebook Page: 202080166468810#!
  • FeedBurner: MortgageFraudBlog
  • Linked In Group: 2104121
  • Google Reader: 562472456
  • Technorati: rdollar
  • Twitter: FraudDiva
  • YouTube: FraudDiva
Quick Links
Get our newsletter
Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
Resources
 

Rachel Dollar Rachel Dollar, the editor of Mortgage Fraud Blog is an attorney and Certified Mortgage Banker who handles litigation for lending institutions and secondary market investors.
Read more about Ms. Dollar

Most Read Articles
Most Commented Articles