Previous: « $1.7M Provided to Arizona to F... | Next: Maryland Announces Results of ... »

Misrepresentations Lead to Mortgage Fraud Charges

Friday, November 13 2009 01:44

Jeffrey D. Stadelmann, 47, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, has been indicted on charges of wire fraud in connection with a fraud scheme he is alleged to have conducted between March 2002 and March 2008. If convicted of this charge, Stadelmann would face a maximum term of imprisonment of 20 years and a fine not to exceed $250,000.

The indictment alleges that Stadelmann and his associate Donna Lonzo, 44, formerly of Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin conspired to defraud Countrywide Home Loans in connection with mortgage loans that they allegedly used to buy a $2 million vacation home in Boulder Junction, Wisconsin. According to the indictment, between November 2005 and January 2006, Stadelmann and Lonzo conspired with another individual having the initials "W.B." to have W.B. apply for and obtain, in W.B.'s name, the $1.8 million in mortgage loans used to purchase the vacation home. The indictment alleges that the three conspired to have W.B. falsely state that he was the borrower and to falsely overstate W.B.'s assets in the loan applications so that W.B. could obtain the mortgage loans, for which otherwise would not have qualified, for Stadelmann's and Lonzo's benefit. The indictment further charges Stadelmann with one count of money laundering. According to the indictment, in October 2006, W.B. obtained over $258,000 in funds from Countrywide through a fraudulent application for a second mortgage on the Boulder Junction property. Stadelmann allegedly then caused W.B. to wire $200,000 of those funds from W.B.'s bank account to Stadelmann's bank account. If convicted of this charge, Stadelmann would face a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years and a fine not to exceed $400,000.

The indictment also alleges that Stadelmann fraudulently obtained over $2.4 million from over 50 investors and private-party lenders based on false pretenses. The indictment alleges that Stadelmann, among other things, obtained money from investors on the false pretense that he would invest their money but that he instead converted their money to his own use and used some of the money to pay other investors. The indictment also charges Stadelmann and his associate Lonzo, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. If convicted of this charge, Stadelmann and Lonzo would each face a maximum term of imprisonment of 5 years and a fine not to exceed $250,000.

The indictment was announced by United States Attorney Michelle L. Jacobs.

The public is cautioned that an indictment is merely the formal method of returning charges against an individual and does not constitute evidence of his guilt. An individual is presumed innocent until such time, if ever, that the government establishes his or her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

5 comments

  • Comment Link ben jefero Sunday, June 13 2010 09:26 posted by ben jefero

    do he have kids?

  • Comment Link A J Magro Monday, April 12 2010 17:34 posted by A J Magro

    Will you be covering the Stadelmann fraud and money laundering trials in Milwaukee WI?

  • Comment Link Joyce Monday, November 16 2009 06:36 posted by Joyce

    My concern is not for the mortgage company in this case. Chase has lost a loan payment and will not attempt to find it. Documentation has been provided that the wire transfer was made. Chase claims it was returned, but there is no trail. A thousand dollar payment is significant to a person who is struggling to make ends meet.

  • Comment Link s Sunday, November 15 2009 15:20 posted by s

    Or how do you like that if a person doesnt know 100 % of the mortgage laws,you can be sent to jail. AND the banks that got bailed out,the c e o getting million dollar bonuses......And they were the ones making all of the fat cash on the subprime bs.....GO figure....lol

  • Comment Link joyce Sunday, November 15 2009 10:06 posted by joyce

    How does an individual get help to recover a mortgage payment that was lose by the lender? We have tried for months and had no success. We have gone as far as the state attorney general office. Most often the comment is the company is too big to tackle. How can we let these lending institutions become so arrogant that they can steal for the little guy?

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

  • del.icio.us: frauddiva
  • Facebook Page: 202080166468810#!
  • FeedBurner: MortgageFraudBlog
  • Linked In Group: 2104121
  • Google Reader: 562472456
  • Technorati: rdollar
  • Twitter: FraudDiva
  • YouTube: FraudDiva
Quick Links
Get our newsletter
Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
Resources
 

Rachel Dollar Rachel Dollar, the editor of Mortgage Fraud Blog is an attorney and Certified Mortgage Banker who handles litigation for lending institutions and secondary market investors.
Read more about Ms. Dollar

Most Read Articles
Most Commented Articles